Access Denied: How Net Neutrality Impacts Our Ability to Consume Media

Net Neutrality is a principle that ensures all internet traffic is treated equally, without discrimination or preference given to certain types of traffic or websites. According to the National Association for Media Literacy Education (NAMLE), access is an essential aspect of media literacy, and it includes "how, when, where, and how often people have access to the tools, technology, and digital skills necessary to thrive." (https://namle.net/) Without Net Neutrality, there is a risk that some consumers may not have access to all the information they need, and it could restrict their ability to participate in society.

Access to information is a fundamental aspect of media literacy, and without Net Neutrality, there is a risk that some consumers may not have access to all the information they need. For example, without Net Neutrality, internet service providers (ISPs) may be able to charge more for access to certain websites or services, or they may even block access to certain websites altogether. This could have a significant impact on how consumers access information, and it could determine what information they receive.

Media literacy also requires access to all information and ideas without censorship. Without Net Neutrality, ISPs would be able to censor certain websites or services, which could have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and the exchange of ideas. For example, ISPs could block access to news websites that are critical of the government, or they could slow down access to websites that offer a different perspective on certain issues. This would be a violation of the human right to freedom of expression and information, and it would limit media literacy for those who are affected by the censorship.

Participation in society, including the ability to receive and convey information, is a global human right. Without Net Neutrality, ISPs would be able to control the flow of information and limit the ability of consumers to participate in society. For example, ISPs could charge more for access to certain websites or services, which would make it more difficult for low-income consumers to access information and participate in society. This would be a violation of the human right to access information and communicate with others, and it would limit media literacy for those who are affected.

In conclusion, Net Neutrality is an essential principle that ensures all consumers have equal access to the information, technology, and ideas that are necessary for media literacy. Without Net Neutrality, ISPs would be able to discriminate against certain types of traffic or websites, which would limit how consumers access information, and it would restrict the freedom of speech and the exchange of ideas. It would also limit the ability of some individuals to participate in society and access information, which is a basic human right. Media literacy requires access to all information and ideas without censorship, and without net neutrality, ISPs would be able to control the flow of information and limit the ability of consumers to participate in society.